From chumblespuzz Wed Dec 1 06:05:03 1999 Received: from lh2.rdc1.ct.home.com (ioracle [24.2.0.67]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id GAA15848 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 06:05:03 -0600 (CST) Received: from RKP200P ([24.228.14.10]) by lh2.rdc1.ct.home.com (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111) with SMTP id <19991201120502.CMBF1992.lh2.rdc1.ct.home.com@RKP200P> for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 04:05:02 -0800 Message-ID: <01a101bf3bf3$f9141d80$0a0ee418 > From: "chumblespuzz" To: References: <3D62AB6FFC80D211A84700104B10CB2C02D95B18 > Subject: Re: Gravitar CPOs - Last Minute Jitters Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 06:51:56 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN Ok, here's my compromise: On my NOS CPO the yellow line is 2 9/16" from the bottom edge. Adding Dan's 1/8" gives me Jeff's 2 11/16". Perfect for both! ;) Note that even if it is off by 1/16" it is an insignificant and unnoticeable amount of variation for the installed CPO. There is no "critical" alingment in the graphics. Thanks! -roy- ----- Original Message ----- From: jeff hendrix To: Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 1999 12:15 AM Subject: RE: Gravitar CPOs - Last Minute Jitters > On my gravitar the gap between the overlay and the bottom edge is 1/16" > And the bottom of the yellow line is 2 11/16" from the bottom. (my yellow > line is 2 5/8" from the edge of the overlay + the 1/16" to the edge of the > CP) > > -jeff > > -----Original Message----- > From: acmech ] > Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 1999 11:35 PM > To: vectorlist > Subject: Re: Gravitar CPOs - Last Minute Jitters > > > I took a look at my Gravitar and the overlay is set back from the bottom > edge > where the hinge is located exactly 1/8". > > Dan > > On Tue, 30 Nov 1999 23:00:56 -0500, you wrote: > > >With the Gravitar CPO I can't do a test fit to assure the sizing accuracy > of > >the NOS CPO, so I need your help. Can anyone tell me if the original CPO > >reaches *exactly* to the bottom edge of the CP? If not, *exactly* how far > is > >it off by? And even better reference would be if someone could measure from > >the bottom edge of the CP to an easy reference point on the CPO, such as > the > >bottom of the outside yellow border. I know this would be difficult to do > >accurately, but perhaps with a cloth tape measure (like those used in > >sewing) or some other flexible scale would be great. > From Rcpilot2u Wed Dec 1 13:07:29 1999 Received: from imo18.mx.aol.com (imo18.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.8]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id NAA02547 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 13:07:25 -0600 (CST) From: Rcpilot2u Received: from Rcpilot2u by imo18.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v24.4.) id g.0.796ccff0 (3979) for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 14:06:35 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <0.796ccff0.2576cbbb > Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 14:06:35 EST Subject: 6100 rev swaps To: vectorlist MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Windows AOL sub 44 Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN Can a older deflection pcb work with a newer HV cage? rev 1 to rev 2 and vise versa? I need to check each out seperately. Thanks. Charles Tweedy City of Lynchburg Network Engineering From raiford Wed Dec 1 13:25:02 1999 Received: from relay4.smtp.psi.net (relay4.smtp.psi.net [38.9.52.2]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id NAA04376 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 13:25:01 -0600 (CST) Received: from [204.240.133.14] (helo=orange) by relay4.smtp.psi.net with smtp (Exim 1.90 #1) id 11tFN5-0006MN-00; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 14:25:00 -0500 Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19991201142011.00a3ea90 > X-Sender: us001378 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 14:20:11 -0500 To: vectorlist From: Jon Raiford Subject: Re: 6100 rev swaps Cc: Rcpilot2u In-Reply-To: <0.796ccff0.2576cbbb > Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN Yes. In fact, I've had one revision give wavy interference (until I removed 2 caps) and another look great (the one w/ the interference was the original). The boards all do the same things (read: connections are the same). Only protection circuits were added and better components installed. Then again, I *could* be wrong :) I know I've swapped boards around though without blowing anything up (the swapping even worked). Jon At 02:06 PM 12/01/1999 EST, you wrote: >Can a older deflection pcb work with a newer HV cage? rev 1 to rev 2 and vise >versa? >I need to check each out seperately. Thanks. > > >Charles Tweedy > >City of Lynchburg Network Engineering > > From Rcpilot2u Wed Dec 1 13:59:13 1999 Received: from imo-d05.mx.aol.com (imo-d05.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.37]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id NAA06923 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 13:59:12 -0600 (CST) From: Rcpilot2u Received: from Rcpilot2u by imo-d05.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v24.4.) id g.0.4f31a6b6 (4330) for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 14:58:38 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <0.4f31a6b6.2576d7ed > Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 14:58:37 EST Subject: Re: 6100 rev swaps To: vectorlist MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Windows AOL sub 44 Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN "Yes. In fact, I've had one revision give wavy interference (until I removed 2 caps) and another look great (the one w/ the interference was the original). " Are you talking about the boxy caps? I thought about removing them also. Thanks for the info. Charles Tweedy From raiford Wed Dec 1 14:09:16 1999 Received: from relay4.smtp.psi.net (relay4.smtp.psi.net [38.9.52.2]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id OAA08248 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 14:09:14 -0600 (CST) Received: from [204.240.133.14] (helo=orange) by relay4.smtp.psi.net with smtp (Exim 1.90 #1) for vectorlist id 11tG3s-0005N0-00; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 15:09:12 -0500 Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19991201150421.00a39260 > X-Sender: us001378 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 15:04:21 -0500 To: vectorlist From: Jon Raiford Subject: Re: 6100 rev swaps In-Reply-To: <0.4f31a6b6.2576d7ed > Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN Yes. Did anyone ever document those on the net? As it is, I keep mentioning whenever they seem almost relevant since I don't have a web page to put the info on. Jon At 02:58 PM 12/01/1999 EST, you wrote: > >"Yes. In fact, I've had one revision give wavy interference (until I removed >2 caps) and another look great (the one w/ the interference was the >original). " > > > >Are you talking about the boxy caps? I thought about removing them also. >Thanks >for the info. > > >Charles Tweedy > > From ClayC Wed Dec 1 14:26:48 1999 Received: from suprahwy.supra.com (suprahwy.supra.com [205.229.114.11]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id OAA09947 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 14:26:44 -0600 (CST) Received: (from smap@localhost) by suprahwy.supra.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA25802 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 12:26:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from supra.com(dogbert.supra.com 10.11.0.21) by suprahwy.supra.com via smap (V2.0) from ; id xma025799; Wed, 1 Dec 99 12:26:22 -0800 Received: from vanmail3.van.diamondmm.com by dogbert.supra.com id aa10713; 1 Dec 99 12:26 PST Received: by vanmail3.van.diamondmm.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 12:26:09 -0800 Message-ID: From: Clay Cowgill To: "'vectorlist '" Subject: Anyone need a solder/desolder station? Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 12:26:08 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN Step right up, step right up! have I got a deal for you! ;-) Ok, this is a blatant "forsale" post, but I'm going to sell these quite cheap and they are really nice for working on vector boards (or most any other boards) so I hope nobody minds... I wound up with a bunch of PACE MBT solder/desolder stations. They look like: http://www.multigame.com/MBT.JPG They seem to be an albino version of the current PACE MBT 201: http://www.paceusa.com/private/public/products/pacesys/mbt20_01.htm So, bad news first: They don't have the PS-80 soldering iron or the SX-70 solder extractor. If you need to buy those new they're $99 and $199 respectively from PACE USA. But, good news second: I'm going to sell these base stations for $75.00 each. $10 shipping (they're heavy!) and for an extra $5 I'll include the little soldering-iron holders that go with them (different from the picture at the PACE website, but they're functional). Even if you have to buy a new PS-80 and SX-70 your total would be around $400. Since an MBT-201A is $825 new from Jensen Tools that's probably still a good deal (basically half price). The catch: I'll test these to make sure the heaters and vacuum pump works, but that's all. You'll have to clean stickers and crap off them and probably have to live with some scratches and dings on the case. I'm not 100% sure how many will test out OK, but I think I have 9 total which I'm guessing will yield about 6 fully functional ones. I'll probably sell "sick" ones cheaper since you can still buy replacement parts from PACE to make a good one if anyone's interested. (I was going to clean these up and eBay them, but I have 20 other projects I'd rather do, and Tara's getting tired of them sitting in the entry-way of the house. ;-) Toss me an e-mail if you're interested ( clay preferred), and I'll test them tonight and confirm availability on a first-come first-served basis. No quantity discounts, sorry! Thanks, -Clay P.S. I have a stack of marquees I need to sell too. Includes really nice Star Trek, Omega Race, Armor Attack and non-vector ones. 11 total, all for $100 plus shipping. E-mail if you'd like to see pictures. From Rcpilot2u Wed Dec 1 14:36:18 1999 Received: from imo-d05.mx.aol.com (imo-d05.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.37]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id OAA10620 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 14:36:15 -0600 (CST) From: Rcpilot2u Received: from Rcpilot2u by imo-d05.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v24.4.) id g.0.1b621395 (3966) for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 15:35:29 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <0.1b621395.2576e090 > Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 15:35:28 EST Subject: Re: 6100 rev swaps To: vectorlist MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Windows AOL sub 44 Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN I never saw any docs on the cap removal. I have 2 pcbs that wiggle bad. This is my next try. Charles From Rcpilot2u Wed Dec 1 14:37:04 1999 Received: from imo18.mx.aol.com (imo18.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.8]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id OAA10729 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 14:37:02 -0600 (CST) From: Rcpilot2u Received: from Rcpilot2u by imo18.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v24.4.) id g.0.aa048fd1 (3966) for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 15:36:27 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <0.aa048fd1.2576e0ca > Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 15:36:26 EST Subject: Re: 6100 rev swaps To: vectorlist MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Windows AOL sub 44 Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN Did the trip circuit really do any good on the later revs (2and 3) ? What does rev 3 have? Never seen a rev 3.. Charles From mypearl@dds.nl Wed Dec 1 14:57:06 1999 Received: from neptune.euro.net (neptune.euro.net [194.134.0.168]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id OAA12144 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 14:56:40 -0600 (CST) Received: from dds.nl (p917.vmw.euronet.nl [194.134.198.81]) by neptune.euro.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA22515 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 21:56:16 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <38458B17.256E9099@dds.nl> Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 21:54:47 +0100 From: Tek Reply-To: vectorlist X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vectorlist Subject: Have I been in the woods or what? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN You know the game: a game board (ofcourse would this be an Atari vector again...:) ) is broken, has the weirdest video effects. You start to do the regular job; poking around with a scope and datalogger... You cannot seem to find the fault, this must be again a problem nobody ever saw before and it probably is a comination of the most unlikely things to happen (bacause this board belongs to you ofcourse)... Then someday I read somewhere that yuo could be SURE a TTL IC (gosh, is there anyting else in Tempest :) is GOOD as soon as it reads normal junction drop from the ground pin to any other! Have I been very stupid by not knowing this or what? I wouldn't mind if this was true... :) This is where you can read about it: http://randyfromm.com/techdept/Randy_Fromms_Arcade_School/general_electronics/how_components_fail/how_components_fail.htm Cya ! From mypearl@dds.nl Wed Dec 1 15:17:43 1999 Received: from neptune.euro.net (neptune.euro.net [194.134.0.168]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id PAA14216 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 15:17:32 -0600 (CST) Received: from dds.nl (p1059.vmw.euronet.nl [194.134.198.187]) by neptune.euro.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA25212 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 22:17:19 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <38459005.11C3B5F3@dds.nl> Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 22:15:49 +0100 From: Tek Reply-To: vectorlist X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vectorlist Subject: Re: Anyone need a solder/desolder station? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN Like I said, why is the cool stuff always in America $$&*% !!! :) Now I have to bother my boss time over time to bring all my game boards tom my workplace... :) Clay Cowgill wrote: > > Step right up, step right up! have I got a deal for you! ;-) > From mypearl@dds.nl Wed Dec 1 15:17:43 1999 Received: from neptune.euro.net (neptune.euro.net [194.134.0.168]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id PAA14217 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 15:17:33 -0600 (CST) Received: from dds.nl (p1059.vmw.euronet.nl [194.134.198.187]) by neptune.euro.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA25227 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 22:17:23 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <3845900A.B27DDB76@dds.nl> Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 22:15:54 +0100 From: Tek Reply-To: vectorlist X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vectorlist Subject: Re: Something cool I didn't realize about Tempest References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN Eric Clayberg wrote: > > >I've looked through the manual, but I can only find the FREEZE DEMO mode > >to zoom down all levels. > > Actually, demo and freeze mode are independent of one another and can be > invoked separately. Having a front mounted freeze switch comes in really > handy when the phone rings while you are playing a normal game. BTW, there > are lots of games out there with freeze modes like this (Star Wars and Tron > come to mind). You are right about this. I use this feature when nature calls... :) > >They did not talk about the ability to actually play these. > >so I guess I've never bothered. > > You can play the levels just fine in demo mode...with the added ability to > "escape" at any time by hitting the start button. The only downside to demo > mode is that it does not record scores. Cool - I've tried allready and it is really cool... I'll never 'not try' a jumper again! :) Cya ! From m-schulz Wed Dec 1 15:37:42 1999 Received: from adventact.com (actgate.adventact.com [208.214.147.130]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id PAA16210 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 15:37:41 -0600 (CST) Received: from mschulz2 (mschulz2 [10.10.10.152]) by adventact.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with SMTP id PAA05001 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 15:37:37 -0600 (CST) From: "Michael Schulz" To: Subject: RE: Anyone need a solder/desolder station? Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 15:40:55 -0600 Message-ID: <003a01bf3c44$bf8b8de0$980a0a0a > MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 In-Reply-To: X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Importance: Normal Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN > Ok, this is a blatant "forsale" post, but I'm going to sell these quite > cheap and they are really nice for working on vector boards (or most any > other boards) so I hope nobody minds... > It was only about three months ago that Joe reminded everyone that the official vectorlist policy is: "Vectorlist is for technical discussions about vector-based arcade games. Everything else (including commerce-related stuff) is off-topic." Has this changed since then? From chris Wed Dec 1 15:49:41 1999 Received: from westnet.com (chris [206.24.6.2]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id PAA18231 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 15:49:39 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (chris@localhost) by westnet.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA15492 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 16:49:23 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 16:49:22 -0500 (EST) From: "Christopher X. Candreva" To: vectorlist Subject: RE: Anyone need a solder/desolder station? In-Reply-To: <003a01bf3c44$bf8b8de0$980a0a0a > Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, Michael Schulz wrote: > arcade games. Everything else (including commerce-related stuff) > is off-topic." > > > Has this changed since then? I think there was a special dispensation in there for Clay's multigame kits and other goodies. :-) -Chris. ========================================================== Chris Candreva -- chris -- (914) 967-7816 WestNet Internet Services of Westchester http://www.westnet.com/ From awilson Wed Dec 1 15:52:28 1999 Received: from mx.seanet.com (dns2.seanet.com [199.181.164.2]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id PAA18629 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 15:52:22 -0600 (CST) Received: from KIMAGURE (host-29-215.dsl-sea.seanet.com [208.12.29.215]) by mx.seanet.com (8.9.3/Seanet-8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA03181 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 13:52:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 13:52:12 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199912012152.NAA03181 > From: Andrew Wilson To: vectorlist In-reply-to: <003a01bf3c44$bf8b8de0$980a0a0a > (m-schulz ) Subject: Not another discussion about the list rules!?!?! References: <003a01bf3c44$bf8b8de0$980a0a0a > Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN Oh, please, god, don't let this turn into another week-long open discussion on acceptable vectorlist posts. Pleeeeeeease... Drew From: "Michael Schulz" Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 15:40:55 -0600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Importance: Normal Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN X-UIDL: 5a9fdae529f69da38b8e8ca1dec2e187 > Ok, this is a blatant "forsale" post, but I'm going to sell these quite > cheap and they are really nice for working on vector boards (or most any > other boards) so I hope nobody minds... > It was only about three months ago that Joe reminded everyone that the official vectorlist policy is: "Vectorlist is for technical discussions about vector-based arcade games. Everything else (including commerce-related stuff) is off-topic." Has this changed since then? From jess Wed Dec 1 15:52:36 1999 Received: from sight.vcn.com (sight.vcn.com [208.162.240.3]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id PAA18678 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 15:52:34 -0600 (CST) Received: from magenta.com (vcn24.pm3-1.lara.wy.vcn.com [208.162.251.90]) by sight.vcn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA00424 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 14:52:31 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <38459900.E305C14F > Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 14:54:08 -0700 From: Jess Askey Organization: Random and Dispersed X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vectorlist Subject: Re: Anyone need a solder/desolder station? References: <003a01bf3c44$bf8b8de0$980a0a0a > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN Clay was giving the vectorlist advance notice and an exclusive price which gives him rights to post them here. Plus, Clay has donated so much to the vectorlist in terms of techie stuff that if we were to kick him off , the list may become lame. ;-) Michael Schulz wrote: > > > Ok, this is a blatant "forsale" post, but I'm going to sell these quite > > cheap and they are really nice for working on vector boards (or most any > > other boards) so I hope nobody minds... > > > > It was only about three months ago that Joe reminded everyone > that the official vectorlist policy is: > > "Vectorlist is for technical discussions about vector-based > arcade games. Everything else (including commerce-related stuff) > is off-topic." > > Has this changed since then? From chris Wed Dec 1 15:57:00 1999 Received: from westnet.com (chris [206.24.6.2]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id PAA19461 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 15:56:58 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (chris@localhost) by westnet.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA16481 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 16:56:40 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 16:56:39 -0500 (EST) From: "Christopher X. Candreva" To: vectorlist Subject: Re: Anyone need a solder/desolder station? In-Reply-To: <38459900.E305C14F > Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, Jess Askey wrote: > techie stuff that if we were to kick him off , the list may become lame. ;-) s/may/would definately/ -Chris ========================================================== Chris Candreva -- chris -- (914) 967-7816 WestNet Internet Services of Westchester http://www.westnet.com/ From tomm Wed Dec 1 16:00:41 1999 Received: from wodc7mr4.ffx.ops.us.uu.net (wodc7mr4.ffx.ops.us.uu.net [192.48.96.29]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id QAA19729 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 16:00:40 -0600 (CST) Received: from mgcap.com by wodc7mr4.ffx.ops.us.uu.net with ESMTP (peer crosschecked as: [208.248.241.145]) id QQhrtn03964 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 21:58:45 GMT Message-ID: <38459A92.FD11A5CE > Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 16:00:50 -0600 From: tom mcclintock Organization: MG Capital X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vectorlist Subject: Re: Anyone need a solder/desolder station? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN I think you have a very good point there... "Christopher X. Candreva" wrote: > > On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, Michael Schulz wrote: > > > arcade games. Everything else (including commerce-related stuff) > > is off-topic." > > > > > > Has this changed since then? > > I think there was a special dispensation in there for Clay's multigame kits > and other goodies. :-) > > -Chris. > > ========================================================== > Chris Candreva -- chris -- (914) 967-7816 > WestNet Internet Services of Westchester > http://www.westnet.com/ From m-schulz Wed Dec 1 16:05:53 1999 Received: from adventact.com (actgate.adventact.com [208.214.147.130]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id QAA20623 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 16:05:50 -0600 (CST) Received: from mschulz2 (mschulz2 [10.10.10.152]) by adventact.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with SMTP id QAA06374 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 16:05:46 -0600 (CST) From: "Michael Schulz" To: Subject: RE: Anyone need a solder/desolder station? Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 16:09:04 -0600 Message-ID: <003b01bf3c48$ae3983e0$980a0a0a > MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 In-Reply-To: X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Importance: Normal Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN > I think there was a special dispensation in there for Clay's > multigame kits and other goodies. :-) > Items such as multigame kits and custom replacements for vector videogame parts do have a valid exception. Desoldering stations do not. If it was permissible to sell test/repair equipment on the list, then there are several people on the list who would have done so already... From mypearl@dds.nl Wed Dec 1 16:09:22 1999 Received: from neptune.euro.net (neptune.euro.net [194.134.0.168]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id QAA21393 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 16:09:15 -0600 (CST) Received: from dds.nl (p952.vmw.euronet.nl [194.134.198.116]) by neptune.euro.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA01941 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 23:09:06 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <38459C29.8987A1C1@dds.nl> Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 23:07:37 +0100 From: Tek Reply-To: vectorlist X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vectorlist Subject: Re: Anyone need a solder/desolder station? References: <003a01bf3c44$bf8b8de0$980a0a0a > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN So you would say this is an average, ordinary forsale, just like any others? Michael Schulz wrote: > > > Ok, this is a blatant "forsale" post, but I'm going to sell these quite > > cheap and they are really nice for working on vector boards (or most any > > other boards) so I hope nobody minds... > > > > It was only about three months ago that Joe reminded everyone > that the official vectorlist policy is: > > "Vectorlist is for technical discussions about vector-based > arcade games. Everything else (including commerce-related stuff) > is off-topic." > > Has this changed since then? From m-schulz Wed Dec 1 16:13:00 1999 Received: from adventact.com (actgate.adventact.com [208.214.147.130]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id QAA21622 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 16:12:59 -0600 (CST) Received: from mschulz2 (mschulz2 [10.10.10.152]) by adventact.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with SMTP id QAA06706 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 16:12:55 -0600 (CST) From: "Michael Schulz" To: Subject: RE: Anyone need a solder/desolder station? Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 16:16:14 -0600 Message-ID: <003c01bf3c49$ae2a7340$980a0a0a > MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 In-Reply-To: <38459900.E305C14F > X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Importance: Normal Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN > Clay was giving the vectorlist advance notice and an exclusive > price which gives him rights to post them here. Plus, Clay has > donated so much to the vectorlist in terms of techie stuff that > if we were to kick him off , the list may become lame. ;-) > Who said anything about kicking him off the list? I just mentioned that the list policy prohibits forsale posts of that particular type. If the policy changes, then that's fine. There are several people here who'd like to see forsale traffic on the list. If not, then that's fine too, but everyone needs to abide by the same policy. From m-schulz Wed Dec 1 16:13:48 1999 Received: from adventact.com (actgate.adventact.com [208.214.147.130]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id QAA21696 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 16:13:47 -0600 (CST) Received: from mschulz2 (mschulz2 [10.10.10.152]) by adventact.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with SMTP id QAA06734 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 16:13:45 -0600 (CST) From: "Michael Schulz" To: Subject: RE: Not another discussion about the list rules!?!?! Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 16:17:04 -0600 Message-ID: <003d01bf3c49$cc0768a0$980a0a0a > MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 In-Reply-To: <199912012152.NAA03181 > X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Importance: Normal Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN Sorry, it's too late... ;-) > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-vectorlist > [mailto:owner-vectorlist ]On Behalf Of Andrew Wilson > Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 1999 3:52 PM > To: vectorlist > Subject: Not another discussion about the list rules!?!?! > > > > Oh, please, god, don't let this turn into another week-long open > discussion on acceptable vectorlist posts. Pleeeeeeease... > > Drew > > From: "Michael Schulz" > Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 15:40:55 -0600 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" > X-Priority: 3 (Normal) > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal > X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 > Importance: Normal > Reply-To: vectorlist > Sender: owner-vectorlist > X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN > X-UIDL: 5a9fdae529f69da38b8e8ca1dec2e187 > > > > Ok, this is a blatant "forsale" post, but I'm going to sell > these quite > > cheap and they are really nice for working on vector boards > (or most any > > other boards) so I hope nobody minds... > > > > It was only about three months ago that Joe reminded everyone > that the official vectorlist policy is: > > "Vectorlist is for technical discussions about vector-based > arcade games. Everything else (including commerce-related stuff) > is off-topic." > > > Has this changed since then? > > > > > > > From ClayC Wed Dec 1 16:17:06 1999 Received: from suprahwy.supra.com (suprahwy.supra.com [205.229.114.11]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id QAA22159 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 16:17:01 -0600 (CST) Received: (from smap@localhost) by suprahwy.supra.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA26707 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 14:16:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from supra.com(dogbert.supra.com 10.11.0.21) by suprahwy.supra.com via smap (V2.0) from ; id xma026701; Wed, 1 Dec 99 14:16:52 -0800 Received: from vanmail3.van.diamondmm.com by dogbert.supra.com id aa11693; 1 Dec 99 14:16 PST Received: by vanmail3.van.diamondmm.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 14:16:52 -0800 Message-ID: From: Clay Cowgill To: "'vectorlist '" Subject: RE: Anyone need a solder/desolder station? Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 14:16:51 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN > It was only about three months ago that Joe reminded everyone > that the official vectorlist policy is: > > "Vectorlist is for technical discussions about vector-based > arcade games. Everything else (including commerce-related stuff) > is off-topic." Ummmmmm... Well officer, I don't think this car can go that fast... and I didn't see the light change... and those children weren't in the street when I went by... and, uhhhh, I'm new to this state... And ummmm... the accelerator stuck! My humble apologies to the list. I thought the equipment would be of sufficient general interest in repair and rework of game hardware as not to ruffle any feathers. (There's been 7 of the desoldering stations spoken for at this point, so I'll call them all sold until I can test them out. Thanks.) The fabulous selection of VECTOR marquees (and others) is still available though. ;-) -Clay From m-schulz Wed Dec 1 16:18:50 1999 Received: from adventact.com (actgate.adventact.com [208.214.147.130]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id QAA22486 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 16:18:49 -0600 (CST) Received: from mschulz2 (mschulz2 [10.10.10.152]) by adventact.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with SMTP id QAA06964 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 16:18:46 -0600 (CST) From: "Michael Schulz" To: Subject: RE: Anyone need a solder/desolder station? Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 16:22:04 -0600 Message-ID: <003e01bf3c4a$7ef67230$980a0a0a > MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 In-Reply-To: <38459C29.8987A1C1@dds.nl> X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Importance: Normal Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN > So you would say this is an average, ordinary forsale, just like any > others? > Yes, I would say so. Was there something in particular that I missed in this post that differentiated it from any other xyz.forsale newsgroup post of used/surplus/whatever desoldering stations for sale? From jhendrix Wed Dec 1 16:19:18 1999 Received: from smtpnew.quark.com (IDENT:root [206.195.78.16]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id QAA22591 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 16:19:16 -0600 (CST) Received: from denver.quark.com (denver.quark.com [206.195.71.192]) by smtpnew.quark.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA23847 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 15:27:38 -0700 Received: by denver.quark.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 15:18:12 -0700 Message-ID: <3D62AB6FFC80D211A84700104B10CB2C02D95B1D > From: jeff hendrix To: "'vectorlist '" Subject: RE: Anyone need a solder/desolder station? Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 15:18:12 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN Burn him, burn him. or give me one for free ;-) -----Original Message----- From: Jess Askey [mailto:jess ] Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 1999 2:54 PM To: vectorlist Subject: Re: Anyone need a solder/desolder station? Clay was giving the vectorlist advance notice and an exclusive price which gives him rights to post them here. Plus, Clay has donated so much to the vectorlist in terms of techie stuff that if we were to kick him off , the list may become lame. ;-) Michael Schulz wrote: > > > Ok, this is a blatant "forsale" post, but I'm going to sell these quite > > cheap and they are really nice for working on vector boards (or most any > > other boards) so I hope nobody minds... > > > > It was only about three months ago that Joe reminded everyone > that the official vectorlist policy is: > > "Vectorlist is for technical discussions about vector-based > arcade games. Everything else (including commerce-related stuff) > is off-topic." > > Has this changed since then? From Rcpilot2u Wed Dec 1 16:26:13 1999 Received: from imo19.mx.aol.com (imo19.mx.aol.com [198.81.17.9]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id QAA23544 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 16:26:13 -0600 (CST) From: Rcpilot2u Received: from Rcpilot2u by imo19.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v24.4.) id g.0.50584f76 (3968) for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 17:25:37 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <0.50584f76.2576fa61 > Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 17:25:37 EST Subject: multi Tempest To: vectorlist MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Windows AOL sub 44 Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN Clay are you still offering the multi Tempest? Charles From m-schulz Wed Dec 1 16:30:52 1999 Received: from adventact.com (actgate.adventact.com [208.214.147.130]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id QAA23995 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 16:30:51 -0600 (CST) Received: from mschulz2 (mschulz2 [10.10.10.152]) by adventact.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with SMTP id QAA07624 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 16:30:49 -0600 (CST) From: "Michael Schulz" To: Subject: RE: Anyone need a solder/desolder station? Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 16:34:07 -0600 Message-ID: <003f01bf3c4c$2e154470$980a0a0a > MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 In-Reply-To: X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Importance: Normal Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN > My humble apologies to the list. I thought the equipment would be of > sufficient general interest in repair and rework of game hardware > as not to ruffle any feathers. > Hey, personally I'd prefer to see the list open up to forsale posts. There are a number of people here who have plenty of test/repair equipment, boards, marquees, etc. that they'd love to sell, and a whole bunch of people who'd love to buy it. I was against the whole "no forsale" policy in the beginning. But, rules are rules... From jacobvids Wed Dec 1 16:46:31 1999 Received: from hotmail.com (f110.law3.hotmail.com [209.185.241.110]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with SMTP id QAA25589 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 16:46:24 -0600 (CST) Received: (qmail 79742 invoked by uid 0); 1 Dec 1999 22:45:45 -0000 Message-ID: <19991201224545.79741.qmail > Received: from 131.241.49.144 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Wed, 01 Dec 1999 14:45:45 PST X-Originating-IP: [131.241.49.144] From: "first anme last name" To: vectorlist Subject: RE: Selling Items on VL Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 22:45:45 GMT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN Hey, Im feeling a little vahclimped. Discuss amongst youselves. I'll give you a tahpic..... I understand the consensus that this list could go haywire if FS posts are allowed, but I for one kind of miss them. Can't we have some sort of compromise on this issue? Like maybe 1 day a month when we can list items for sale? Otherwise, they just all go to eBay and minimise one of the benefits of being on this list. Comments? ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com From matt Wed Dec 1 16:46:46 1999 Received: from admin.veriosc.com (admin.veriosc.com [192.215.246.2]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id QAA25651 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 16:46:45 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (matt@localhost) by admin.veriosc.com (/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA07960 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 14:48:03 -0800 (PST) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.veriosc.com: matt owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 14:48:03 -0800 (PST) From: Matt Rossiter - Verio Southern California X-Sender: matt@admin To: "'vectorlist '" Subject: RE: Anyone need a solder/desolder station? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN I think we should think of a nice punishment for Clay. I know, Clay *must* design a multi-compatible sound board for his Sega Multi-Game. Yeah - that'll teach him not to send out emails that gives vectorlist subscribers special deals on stuff that might be of interest to the group as a whole. errr... wait - was that part of the accepable list policy? Joe? Matt _____________________________________________________________________ On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, Clay Cowgill wrote: > > It was only about three months ago that Joe reminded everyone > > that the official vectorlist policy is: > > > > "Vectorlist is for technical discussions about vector-based > > arcade games. Everything else (including commerce-related stuff) > > is off-topic." > > Ummmmmm... Well officer, I don't think this car can go that fast... and I > didn't see the light change... and those children weren't in the street > when I went by... and, uhhhh, I'm new to this state... And ummmm... the > accelerator stuck! > > My humble apologies to the list. I thought the equipment would be of > sufficient general interest in repair and rework of game hardware as not to > ruffle any feathers. > > (There's been 7 of the desoldering stations spoken for at this point, so > I'll call them all sold until I can test them out. Thanks.) > > The fabulous selection of VECTOR marquees (and others) is still available > though. ;-) > > -Clay > > From jess Wed Dec 1 16:57:32 1999 Received: from roper.uwyo.edu (pmdf@roper.uwyo.edu [129.72.10.8]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id QAA27663 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 16:57:30 -0600 (CST) Received: from asuwlink.uwyo.edu (asuwlink.uwyo.edu [129.72.10.2]) by ROPER.UWYO.EDU (PMDF V5.2-32 #33749) with ESMTP id <0FM3004GB3O6W8@ROPER.UWYO.EDU> for vectorlist ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 15:55:18 -0700 (MST) Received: from magenta.com (ras8721.uwyo.edu [129.72.87.21]) by asuwlink.uwyo.edu (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA13760 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 1999 15:55:17 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 15:56:55 -0700 From: Jess Askey Subject: Re: Anyone need a solder/desolder station? To: vectorlist Message-id: <3845A7B7.85ECDF0E > MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win98; I) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en References: <003c01bf3c49$ae2a7340$980a0a0a > Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN Michael Schulz wrote: > Who said anything about kicking him off the list? I just mentioned that the > list policy prohibits forsale posts of that particular type. (Sorry Chris). I think the official rule is this... no for sale post, ebay adverts. If the for sale is *exclusive* to the vectorlist and a price break given to vectorlisters and the item is vector related (soldering on vector board fer instance), then it is allowed. Like Roy's overlays... vector related, price break for us and I don't think they are on RGVAC (but Im not sure since I don't look anymore). Roy + overlays + vectorlist = Happy Vectorlisters! :-) I think many people like to see stuff for sale here because it is close group of vector collectors. but we don't want 6 posts a day from people selling off junk. I think it is more of a personal judgement for the individual posting the info. Clay also had some Vector Marquee's in the same post which made a bit more vector related as well. He also, sort of apologized up front on his post. I think we need a vectorlist FAQ. Paul.... Can I please write one? Can majordomo put a generic footer on all vectorlist posts that has a link to it? I think that would really cut down on some basic questions that *always* come up. jess From batlzone@cyberenet.net Wed Dec 1 17:17:11 1999 Received: from almail ([208.33.11.3]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with SMTP id RAA01175 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 17:17:06 -0600 (CST) Received: from cyberenet.net (10.2.3.249[10.2.3.249])by AWARNER4(MailMax 3.059) with ESMTP id 735 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 1999 18:12:39 -0500 EST Message-ID: <3845AB67.D9CA569A@cyberenet.net> Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 18:12:39 -0500 From: Al Warner X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vectorlist Subject: Re: Selling Items on VL References: <19991201224545.79741.qmail > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN Here is my take on this. I think the current "No for sale ads" is a good policy. Considering I'm more of a lurker, I think it cuts down on the Signal to Noise ratio. Most for sale ads that do make it on here usually do so as project info posts that end with "They're ready, they will ship for $XX.XX each. Clay is an invaluable resource (and my hero). For him, a bending of the rules is in order. I don't think this was innapropriate. Quite the opposite. It was a special deal for the loyal readers of the list. I don't think I have the right to do something like this, but I'm down with Clay doing it. -Al- PS - MULTIGAME.COM should be called MULTILAME.COM since Clay decided to lay low. I understand why, it just sucks. He's still my hero though. first anme last name wrote: > Hey, > > Im feeling a little vahclimped. Discuss amongst youselves. I'll give you a > tahpic..... > I understand the consensus that this list could go haywire if FS posts are > allowed, but I for one kind of miss them. Can't we have some sort of > compromise on this issue? Like maybe 1 day a month when we can list items > for sale? Otherwise, they just all go to eBay and minimise one of the > benefits of being on this list. Comments? > > ______________________________________________________ > Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com -- ===================================================================== -= Al Warner batlzone@cyberenet.net =- -= Learn how to install a Cap Kit in your video game's monitor and =- -= see a whole lot more on my web page at: =- -= http://www.cyberenet.net/~batlzone =- ===================================================================== From zonn Wed Dec 1 17:45:38 1999 Received: from mail.propeller.com (IDENT:qmailr [204.216.217.130]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with SMTP id RAA04401 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 17:45:35 -0600 (CST) Received: (qmail 21561 invoked from network); 1 Dec 1999 23:45:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO phd-zonn.propeller.com) (139.85.201.239) by ns1.propeller.com with SMTP; 1 Dec 1999 23:45:30 -0000 From: Zonn To: vectorlist Subject: Re: Selling Items on VL Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 15:48:43 -0800 Message-ID: References: <19991201224545.79741.qmail > In-Reply-To: <19991201224545.79741.qmail > X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.7/32.534 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu id RAA04402 Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN On Wed, 01 Dec 1999 22:45:45 GMT, you wrote: >Hey, > >Im feeling a little vahclimped. Discuss amongst youselves. I'll give you a >tahpic..... >I understand the consensus that this list could go haywire if FS posts are >allowed, but I for one kind of miss them. Can't we have some sort of >compromise on this issue? Like maybe 1 day a month when we can list items >for sale? Otherwise, they just all go to eBay and minimise one of the >benefits of being on this list. Comments? A benefit of being on this list is *not* being spammed! Not the opposite. What is there to miss? It's not like you can't go to the net and find things for sale (RGVAC, RGVAM, eBay, Yahoo, Buy.com, etc). This list has a large subscription rate because of the very high S/N ratio (very few, if any adds). RGVAC was once like this, a great place to go for technical advice. I'm under the belief that if the FS posts had stayed off of RGVAC, vectorlist would never have become as popular as it has. I for one only read RGVAC occasionally now (through a huge FS/FA/ETC filter), where once I followed it daily. Too noisy. This would be an interesting experiment. Let's say vectorlist allows adds, I then start a new mailing list (vectorlist++ or something), all I do is repost all messages from vectorlist, excluding adds. (And of course it would accept direct posts that were not advertisements.) How many would leave vectorlist and go to vectorlist++? One of the reasons vectorlist is popular is the lack of adds. Of course one of the things most attractive to a seller is popularity. If someone here is really itchin' to advertise, just go post it on RGVAC, wasn't that what the RGVAC/RGVAM fight was all about? Or will we have to just keep running from spam by starting YASFML (Yet Another Spam Free Mailing List.) -Zonn From mowerman Wed Dec 1 18:04:20 1999 Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.60]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id SAA07073 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 18:04:19 -0600 (CST) Received: from 207-172-109-11.s11.tnt1.war.va.dialup.rcn.com ([207.172.109.11] helo=erols.com) by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #3) id 11tJir-0004gi-00 for vectorlist ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 19:03:47 -0500 Message-ID: <3845B590.E4672897 > Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 18:56:00 -0500 From: Kev X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vectorlist Subject: Re: Selling Items on VL References: <19991201224545.79741.qmail > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN first anme last name wrote: Comments? Well I guess I missed out on a solder station.... JR just created a new mailing list for test equipment, would it have been better if Clay posted there? Is it a fair consensus among the readers here that those inclined to also do repair would follow JR's new mailing list (TTL) (I'm assuming that his list also allows FS providing it is tech tool related.) Let's not get in a huff, just resolve the issue (however slight). -- Kev Mowerman >>REMOVE THE ? to REPLY Looking for Pac-Man related hacks & Video Game Coin Op Page -> http://www.erols.com/mowerman From matt Wed Dec 1 18:21:20 1999 Received: from admin.veriosc.com (admin.veriosc.com [192.215.246.2]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id SAA12603 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 18:21:18 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (matt@localhost) by admin.veriosc.com (/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA15593 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 16:22:37 -0800 (PST) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.veriosc.com: matt owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 16:22:37 -0800 (PST) From: Matt Rossiter - Verio Southern California X-Sender: matt@admin To: vectorlist Subject: Re: Selling Items on VL In-Reply-To: <3845B590.E4672897 > Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN I've always thought it was quite clear that selling items on vectorlist was acceptable as long as the items are unique or would be in the general interest of the list and a discount is offered. So - saying "Hey I've got a dead asteroids that I want to get rid of for $500" is not appropriate - but maybe "I've got a mint condition Cosmic Chasm that I'm offering to those on this list for $500 where I would normally ask $900". Even the CPO's are being offered here on this list and no one has argued yet. Maybe it's just one of those issues we need to revisit every 6 months or so. :\ Matt _____________________________________________________________________ On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, Kev wrote: > > > first anme last name wrote: > > Comments? > > Well I guess I missed out on a solder station.... > > JR just created a new mailing list for test equipment, would it have been > better if Clay posted there? > > Is it a fair consensus among the readers here that those inclined to also do > repair would follow JR's new mailing list (TTL) (I'm assuming that his list > also allows FS providing it is tech tool related.) > > Let's not get in a huff, just resolve the issue (however slight). > -- > Kev Mowerman >>REMOVE THE ? to REPLY > > Looking for Pac-Man related hacks & Video Game > > Coin Op Page -> http://www.erols.com/mowerman > > From jwelser Wed Dec 1 19:41:16 1999 Received: from piglet.cc.utexas.edu (jwelser@piglet.cc.utexas.edu [128.83.42.61]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id TAA26357 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 19:41:15 -0600 (CST) From: jwelser Received: from localhost (jwelser@localhost) by piglet.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1/piglet.mc-1.10) with ESMTP id TAA26495 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 19:41:14 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 19:41:13 -0600 (CST) X-Sender: jwelser@piglet.cc.utexas.edu To: vectorlist Subject: RE: Selling Items on VL In-Reply-To: <19991201224545.79741.qmail > Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, first anme last name wrote: > I understand the consensus that this list could go haywire if FS posts are > allowed, but I for one kind of miss them. Can't we have some sort of > compromise on this issue? Like maybe 1 day a month when we can list items > for sale? Otherwise, they just all go to eBay and minimise one of the > benefits of being on this list. Comments? > Wow, I log off to actually do some work, and look what happens! First of all,"First anme last name," I'm not sure how or why you "miss" for sale posts, because they were NEVER really allowed. NOW, onto the forever tricky subject of for sale posts on vectorlist......I want the list to remain dedicated to technical discussions about vector-based arcade games. I still believe that minimizing the amount of for sale traffic is necessary to maintain a good SNR. There are plenty of places to find stuff for sale -- this doesn't have to be one of them. Nevertheless, most people know that just about any for sale post has been tolerated in the past, and some have taken advantage of this. I think Clay's intentions were good, but I think that his post was still not appropriate for the list......but not by much. The problem is, and has always been, that there is no real "quantitative" way to define what is and what isn't appropriate for the list. Let's leave it at this: If you are thinking of advertising something on this list, and there is any doubt in your mind as to whether or not it is appropriate, DON'T post it, because it's probably not appropriate. In the past, the participants of this list have done a good job of keeping themselves in check, and policing themselves, and I'd like it to stay that way. However, if I feel that an SNR problem is developing due to excessive for sale traffic, I will probably make the list so that it is retro/robo moderated. Essentially what this means is that all posts are approved by default, but that a list of "problem" posters can be made that have to be moderated first. If you were expecting any major words of wisdom, or any serious policy change, I'm sorry to disappoint you. Let's just get back to "business" as usual, and try and keep it on topic. Thanks, Joe P.S. If you're wondering why I used "I" a lot, instead of "we" (i.e. Paul and I are supposed to be co-owners of the list,) as far as I can tell, Paul is still having some problems with his email account, and is not getting list messages. So, for the meantime, I guess it's just me running the show -- Muhahahahahaha ;-) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Joseph J. Welser jwelser Design Engineer -- Crystal Semiconductor Corporation Ph.D. Student in E.E. -- University of Texas at Austin Work: jwelser P.O. Box 17847; Austin, TX 78760 ------------------------------------------------------------------ From Burbs1@concentric.net Wed Dec 1 20:06:17 1999 Received: from uhura.concentric.net (uhura.concentric.net [206.173.118.93]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id UAA29118 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 20:06:17 -0600 (CST) Received: from marconi.concentric.net (marconi.concentric.net [206.173.118.71]) by uhura.concentric.net (8.9.1a/(98/12/15 5.12)) id VAA22722; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 21:06:16 -0500 (EST) [1-800-745-2747 The Concentric Network] Errors-To: Received: from concentric.net (ts013d08.par-nj.concentric.net [216.112.170.116]) by marconi.concentric.net (8.9.1a) id VAA28475; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 21:06:14 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3845D426.3FC34962@concentric.net> Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 21:06:31 -0500 From: Mark E Davidson Reply-To: vectorlist X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vectorlist Subject: Re: multi Tempest References: <0.50584f76.2576fa61 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN What makes you think I ever owned a Mini tempest? -=Mark=- Rcpilot2u wrote: > Clay are you still offering the multi Tempest? > > Charles From chumblespuzz Wed Dec 1 20:14:31 1999 Received: from lh2.rdc1.ct.home.com (ioracle [24.2.0.67]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id UAA00075 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 20:14:30 -0600 (CST) Received: from RKP200P ([24.228.14.10]) by lh2.rdc1.ct.home.com (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111) with SMTP id <19991202021417.HDMA1992.lh2.rdc1.ct.home.com@RKP200P> for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 18:14:17 -0800 Message-ID: <005d01bf3c6a$a215c980$0a0ee418 > From: "chumblespuzz" To: References: <19991201224545.79741.qmail > <3845AB67.D9CA569A@cyberenet.net> Subject: Re: Selling Items on VL Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 21:12:06 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN Well, what about my CPOs? Aside from Crystal Castles (which I needed for my macine) all my CPOs have been for vector games. All of them have been produced to help restore vector machines, and some of them have been done to help specific VL subscribers (such as the dedicated Major Havoc and Gravitar). I certainly don't do this for the profit (if you can even call it that). Do you know how many people responded to my post for Gravitar CPOs? *Z*E*R*O* !!! Sure, Simon will take one ;) and one other VL'er agreed to take one before the post, but do you think I will ever recoupe my time on this? Of course not. I never expected to. I do this to help all of us. I wish that the actual production for these was free. Then I'd just give them away. But it's not so I can't. Do you think that if it cost Clay or Zonn to give such good advice it would be given away so freely? Fortunately for all of us, their skills can be expressed in words. Mine requires some capital. What good would it be for anyone if I redrew the art and just made bitmaps of it, never actually producing the CPOs? What about the new vector monitor project? Lot's of people here have contributed to it. Once these are produced should they not be offered first to the VL (at a discounted price, I hope)? If you all think that it's wrong to for me to "sell" CPOs on the VL, then I'll stop. Sure I could make more on them on RGVAC, but I truly value the information I get on the vector list and I just want to give something back. I don't think that everything should be available for sale on the VL, but where there is a clear benefit to the group for vector related items it should be considered. Perhaps there should be a VLFS gatekeeper. All FS posts should go through him first, and if deemed appropriate then passed on to the list. It'd be an ugly job, and I sure wouldn't want it. -roy- From shag Wed Dec 1 20:54:11 1999 Received: from smtprch1.nortel.com (smtprch1.nortelnetworks.com [192.135.215.14]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id UAA03793 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 20:54:11 -0600 (CST) Received: from zrchb213.us.nortel.com (actually zrchb213) by smtprch1.nortel.com; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 20:53:36 -0600 Received: by zrchb213.us.nortel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 20:53:25 -0600 Message-ID: <402CC1A33A3FD311A5A00000F8082A5F14E7F7 > From: "Simon Whittam" To: "'vectorlist '" Subject: RE: Selling Items on VL Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 20:53:22 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01BF3C70.66E79A22" Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01BF3C70.66E79A22 Content-Type: text/plain Damn, now I feel all guilty for asking you to consider doing a Gravitar CPO. :-( I thought for sure, if you did a BW, that a Gravitar would be in-demand. Who knew? I guess asking for a Berzerk CPO and Venture CPO is now out of the question ... woops (those arn't v-e-c-t-o-r games)! Me bad. I for one think you're doing a great service to the hobby and offering CPOs (vector even) to the group is beyond reproach. Rant as you will but remember some (if not most) of us appreciate what you're doing (for profit or not). I don't think its breaking the charter. Damn if I had a few extra soldering stations, I'd sell them first to people who "love" the hobby as I do ... instead of to the masses who don't give a damn about why my Asteroids are all "wavy" or why my SW keeps giving me mathbox errors ... Anyway, just be glad you're not a "duck". :-) [Replace the "d" with "f" if you wish]. SPW Kanata, On CANADA p.s. Go bad and do what every other money grubbin' bastard is doing, and sell them to the highest bidder on Ebay. Screw the hobby, who !@#$'n cares!!! > -----Original Message----- > From: chumblespuzz [SMTP:chumblespuzz ] > Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 1999 9:12 PM > To: vectorlist > Subject: Re: Selling Items on VL > > > > Well, what about my CPOs? Aside from Crystal Castles (which I needed for > my > macine) all my CPOs have been for vector games. All of them have been > produced to help restore vector machines, and some of them have been done > to > help specific VL subscribers (such as the dedicated Major Havoc and > Gravitar). > > I certainly don't do this for the profit (if you can even call it that). > Do > you know how many people responded to my post for Gravitar CPOs? *Z*E*R*O* > !!! Sure, Simon will take one ;) and one other VL'er agreed to take one > before the post, but do you think I will ever recoupe my time on this? Of > course not. I never expected to. I do this to help all of us. > > I wish that the actual production for these was free. Then I'd just give > them away. But it's not so I can't. Do you think that if it cost Clay or > Zonn to give such good advice it would be given away so freely? > Fortunately > for all of us, their skills can be expressed in words. Mine requires some > capital. What good would it be for anyone if I redrew the art and just > made > bitmaps of it, never actually producing the CPOs? > > What about the new vector monitor project? Lot's of people here have > contributed to it. Once these are produced should they not be offered > first > to the VL (at a discounted price, I hope)? > > If you all think that it's wrong to for me to "sell" CPOs on the VL, then > I'll stop. Sure I could make more on them on RGVAC, but I truly value the > information I get on the vector list and I just want to give something > back. > > I don't think that everything should be available for sale on the VL, but > where there is a clear benefit to the group for vector related items it > should be considered. Perhaps there should be a VLFS gatekeeper. All FS > posts should go through him first, and if deemed appropriate then passed > on > to the list. It'd be an ugly job, and I sure wouldn't want it. > > > > -roy- > ------_=_NextPart_001_01BF3C70.66E79A22 Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable RE: Selling Items on VL

Damn, now I feel all = guilty for asking you to consider doing a
Gravitar = CPO.   :-(   I thought for sure, if you did a BW, = that
a Gravitar would be = in-demand.   Who knew?

I guess asking for a = Berzerk CPO and Venture CPO is now
out of the question = ... woops (those arn't v-e-c-t-o-r games)!
Me bad.

I for one think = you're doing a great service to the hobby and
offering CPOs = (vector even) to the group is beyond reproach.
Rant as you will = but remember some (if not most) of us appreciate what
you're doing (for = profit or not).  I don't think its breaking the
charter.  Damn = if I had a few extra soldering stations, I'd sell
them first to = people who "love" the hobby as I do ... instead
of to the masses = who don't give a damn about why my
Asteroids are all = "wavy" or why my SW keeps giving me
mathbox errors = ...

Anyway, just be glad = you're not a "duck".  :-)  [Replace the
"d" with = "f" if you wish].

  SPW
  Kanata, = On
  = CANADA

<my time to = rant>
p.s.  Go bad = and do what every other money grubbin' bastard
is doing, and sell = them to the highest bidder on Ebay.  Screw
the hobby, who = !@#$'n cares!!! 
<end of rant, I = feel better, sorry if I bugg'd anyone here - me have bad day = today>

    -----Original Message-----
    chumblespuzz = [SMTP:chumblespuzz ]
    Sent:   Wednesday, December 01, 1999 9:12 PM
    To:     vectorlist
    Subject:       = Re: Selling Items on VL

    <rant>

    Well, what about my CPOs? Aside from = Crystal Castles (which I needed for my
    macine) all my CPOs have been for = vector games. All of them have been
    produced to help restore vector = machines, and some of them have been done to
    help specific VL subscribers (such as = the dedicated Major Havoc and
    Gravitar).

    I certainly don't do this for the = profit (if you can even call it that). Do
    you know how many people responded to = my post for Gravitar CPOs? *Z*E*R*O*
    !!! Sure, Simon will take one ;) and = one other VL'er agreed to take one
    before the post, but do you think I = will ever recoupe my time on this? Of
    course not. I never expected to. I do = this to help all of us.

    I wish that the actual production for = these was free. Then I'd just give
    them away. But it's not so I can't. = Do you think that if it cost Clay or
    Zonn to give such good advice it = would be given away so freely? Fortunately
    for all of us, their skills can be = expressed in words. Mine requires some
    capital. What good would it be for = anyone if I redrew the art and just made
    bitmaps of it, never actually = producing the CPOs?

    What about the new vector monitor = project? Lot's of people here have
    contributed to it. Once these are = produced should they not be offered first
    to the VL (at a discounted price, I = hope)?

    If you all think that it's wrong to = for me to "sell" CPOs on the VL, then
    I'll stop. Sure I could make more on = them on RGVAC, but I truly value the
    information I get on the vector list = and I just want to give something back.

    I don't think that everything should = be available for sale on the VL, but
    where there is a clear benefit to the = group for vector related items it
    should be considered. Perhaps there = should be a VLFS gatekeeper. All FS
    posts should go through him first, = and if deemed appropriate then passed on
    to the list. It'd be an ugly job, and = I sure wouldn't want it.

    </rant>

    -roy-

------_=_NextPart_001_01BF3C70.66E79A22-- From Rcpilot2u Wed Dec 1 21:54:28 1999 Received: from imo-d04.mx.aol.com (imo-d04.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.36]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id VAA08374 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 21:54:26 -0600 (CST) From: Rcpilot2u Received: from Rcpilot2u by imo-d04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v24.4.) id g.0.b91ee04a (3934) for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 22:53:52 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <0.b91ee04a.25774750 > Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 22:53:52 EST Subject: Re: multi Tempest To: vectorlist MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Windows AOL sub 44 Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN Multi game Tempest kit..... In a message dated 12/1/1999 9:16:13 PM Eastern Standard Time, Burbs1@concentric.net writes: << What makes you think I ever owned a Mini tempest? -=Mark=- Rcpilot2u wrote: > Clay are you still offering the multi Tempest? > > Charles >> From kmahan Wed Dec 1 21:55:25 1999 Received: from mail.xmission.com (root [198.60.22.22]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id VAA08544 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 21:55:25 -0600 (CST) Received: from xmission.xmission.com ([198.60.22.20] ident=kmahan) by mail.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #3) id 11tNL2-0002E4-00 for vectorlist ; Wed, 01 Dec 1999 20:55:24 -0700 Received: (from kmahan@localhost) by xmission.xmission.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) id UAA05609 for vectorlist ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 20:55:22 -0700 (MST) From: Kurt Mahan Message-Id: <199912020355.UAA05609 > Subject: Re: Gravitar CPOs - Ready for Pre-Order! To: vectorlist Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 20:55:22 -0700 (MST) In-Reply-To: <006b01bf3b94$11d2f5e0$0a0ee418 > from "chumblespuzz" at Nov 30, 99 07:36:12 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN Hi! Sorry to be so slow (I'm a loser).. Sign me up for 1. Oh yeah, I'm in for 1 or 2 reactors.. (actually, I've got have at least one of all your cpos -- since you're doing cool games that I'm gonna find sooner or later.. :) The happiness is that we stop death marching on saturday. (supposedly).. Then I can get back interesting things.. Of course I was given permission to take time out to fix the stick on the Mortal Kombat II I've got at the office (amazing how addicted those people get -- I'm not even a fan of the game.. :) Kurt > I have just received the proof for the Gravitar CPO from my printer and it > is beautiful. You can check it out at: > > http://members.home.net/chumblespuzz/images/gravitar_cpo_preview.jpg > > The blues look washed out in the top picture, but that is because of the > flash. The bottom picture was taken without the flash to show the blues > better. > > The Vector List price for these will be $55 each + $5 shipping. This price > is good for one week from today. After that the price will go up to $65 > each. > > If interested, please email me directly at chumblespuzz . > > My next project is the Reactor CPO and is coming along nicely. I'll keep you > all posted on the progress. > > Thanks, > -roy- > > From awilson Wed Dec 1 22:06:40 1999 Received: from mx.seanet.com (dns2.seanet.com [199.181.164.2]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id WAA09583 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 22:06:39 -0600 (CST) Received: from KIMAGURE (host-29-215.dsl-sea.seanet.com [208.12.29.215]) by mx.seanet.com (8.9.3/Seanet-8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA14087 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 20:06:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 20:06:38 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199912020406.UAA14087 > From: Andrew Wilson To: vectorlist In-reply-to: <199912020355.UAA05609 > (message from Kurt Mahan on Wed, 1 Dec 1999 20:55:22 -0700 (MST)) Subject: Re: Gravitar CPOs - Ready for Pre-Order! References: <199912020355.UAA05609 > Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN OK, time to sic the Retro/robo-moderator on Kurt ;-P Drew From: Kurt Mahan Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 20:55:22 -0700 (MST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN X-UIDL: 71532273dda89b9ee9fb7d5a518a9e90 Hi! Sorry to be so slow (I'm a loser).. Sign me up for 1. Oh yeah, I'm in for 1 or 2 reactors.. (actually, I've got have at least one of all your cpos -- since you're doing cool games that I'm gonna find sooner or later.. :) The happiness is that we stop death marching on saturday. (supposedly).. Then I can get back interesting things.. Of course I was given permission to take time out to fix the stick on the Mortal Kombat II I've got at the office (amazing how addicted those people get -- I'm not even a fan of the game.. :) Kurt > I have just received the proof for the Gravitar CPO from my printer and it > is beautiful. You can check it out at: > > http://members.home.net/chumblespuzz/images/gravitar_cpo_preview.jpg > > The blues look washed out in the top picture, but that is because of the > flash. The bottom picture was taken without the flash to show the blues > better. > > The Vector List price for these will be $55 each + $5 shipping. This price > is good for one week from today. After that the price will go up to $65 > each. > > If interested, please email me directly at chumblespuzz . > > My next project is the Reactor CPO and is coming along nicely. I'll keep you > all posted on the progress. > > Thanks, > -roy- > > From jrr Wed Dec 1 22:33:20 1999 Received: from mail.rdc1.ne.home.com (imail [24.2.4.66]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id WAA11983 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 22:33:14 -0600 (CST) Received: from cr689357-a ([24.113.14.85]) by mail.rdc1.ne.home.com (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111) with ESMTP id <19991202043312.NEND11793.mail.rdc1.ne.home.com@cr689357-a> for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 20:33:12 -0800 Message-Id: <4.2.1.19991201152835.00ad0260 > X-Sender: flippers X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.1 Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 15:29:32 -0800 To: vectorlist From: John Robertson Subject: RE: Anyone need a solder/desolder station? In-Reply-To: <003f01bf3c4c$2e154470$980a0a0a > References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN If you want to sell service equipment why not use my new list TechToolsList ? I know this is not vector, but maybe the discussion can end here... John :-#)# At 04:34 PM 12/1/1999 -0600, you wrote: > > My humble apologies to the list. I thought the equipment would be of > > sufficient general interest in repair and rework of game hardware > > as not to ruffle any feathers. > > >Hey, personally I'd prefer to see the list open up to forsale posts. >There are a number of people here who have plenty of test/repair >equipment, boards, marquees, etc. that they'd love to sell, and a >whole bunch of people who'd love to buy it. I was against the whole >"no forsale" policy in the beginning. But, rules are rules... John's Jukes Ltd. 2343 Main St., Vancouver, BC, Canada V5T 3C9 Call (604)872-5757 or Fax 872-2010 (Pinballs, Jukes, Video Games) http://www.flippers.com "Old pinballers never die, they just flip out." From kmahan Wed Dec 1 23:05:20 1999 Received: from mail.xmission.com (root [198.60.22.22]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id XAA14477 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 23:05:20 -0600 (CST) Received: from xmission.xmission.com ([198.60.22.20] ident=kmahan) by mail.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #3) id 11tOQh-0001eb-00 for vectorlist ; Wed, 01 Dec 1999 22:05:19 -0700 Received: (from kmahan@localhost) by xmission.xmission.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) id WAA13812 for vectorlist ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 22:05:18 -0700 (MST) From: Kurt Mahan Message-Id: <199912020505.WAA13812 > Subject: Re: Gravitar CPOs - Ready for Pre-Order! To: vectorlist Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 22:05:18 -0700 (MST) In-Reply-To: <199912020406.UAA14087 > from "Andrew Wilson" at Dec 1, 99 08:06:38 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN *&##@*! Sorry to spam the list. I've been wondering when I was going to screw up like this. Guess it was good that it was a least sort of vector related. :) Kurt > OK, time to sic the Retro/robo-moderator on Kurt ;-P > > Drew > > From: Kurt Mahan > Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 20:55:22 -0700 (MST) > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > Reply-To: vectorlist > Sender: owner-vectorlist > X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN > X-UIDL: 71532273dda89b9ee9fb7d5a518a9e90 > From FBowen Thu Dec 2 10:00:21 1999 Received: from balrelay.balt.checkfree.com ([207.196.74.140]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id KAA03425 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 10:00:15 -0600 (CST) From: FBowen Subject: RE: Selling Items on VL To: vectorlist Cc: Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 10:53:31 -0500 Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on BALRELAY/MD/CheckFree(Release 5.0.1|July 16, 1999) at 12/02/99 11:02:51 AM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN I'm not trying to keep this thread going (REALLY!) but it will come up again (and again and again and again). Why? Because the FS criteria is SUBJECTIVE! I too hardly ever read RGVAC anymore (except for the Clay & Mark Spaeth threads. They are really funny) because one must do a lot of work to find the useful information. But I would also like the possibility to share and get good deals on ANYTHING that could conceivably be related to vector videogames (parts, equipment, service, records, posters, etc). A lot of times I don't know that these things exist, so how can I look for them? I propose we take the previous idea of only allowing them on one day a month and add the requirement that the subject start with one string: "COMMERCE:" This would apply for anything to be sold, bought, traded, beaten up, blended, given away, transmogrified, etc. This would resolve the issue with the subjective criteria and different people's interpretations. Then people could set up filters on the string and/or delete all messages from the specified day if they choose. HOWEVER, I would prefer to keep the list in it's current state than see it turn into another RGVAC, if those are the only two choices. jwelser on 12/01/99 08:41:13 PM Please respond to vectorlist Sent by: owner-vectorlist To: vectorlist cc: Subject: RE: Selling Items on VL On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, first anme last name wrote: > I understand the consensus that this list could go haywire if FS posts are > allowed, but I for one kind of miss them. Can't we have some sort of > compromise on this issue? Like maybe 1 day a month when we can list items > for sale? Otherwise, they just all go to eBay and minimise one of the > benefits of being on this list. Comments? > I think Clay's intentions were good, but I think that his post was still not appropriate for the list......but not by much. The problem is, and has always been, that there is no real "quantitative" way to define what is and what isn't appropriate for the list. Let's leave it at this: If you are thinking of advertising something on this list, and there is any doubt in your mind as to whether or not it is appropriate, DON'T post it, because it's probably not appropriate. From sozdemir Thu Dec 2 10:17:43 1999 Received: from ckmso1.proxy.att.com (ckmso1.att.com [12.20.58.69]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id KAA06227 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 10:17:42 -0600 (CST) Received: from gab200r1.ems.att.com ([135.37.94.32]) by ckmso1.proxy.att.com (AT&T IPNS/MSO-2.2) with ESMTP id LAA06693 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 11:17:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from mo3980bh1.ems.att.com by gab200r1.ems.att.com (8.8.8+Sun/ATTEMS-1.4.1 sol2) id LAA08686; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 11:17:38 -0500 (EST) Received: by mo3980bh1.ems.att.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 10:16:59 -0600 Message-ID: From: "Ozdemir, Steven S, GOVMK" To: vectorlist Subject: RE: Selling Items on VL Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 10:16:39 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN G'day folks, Adding commerce related topics to any discussion starts the group down a slippery slope. I remember a time (almost a decade ago) when RGV/RGVA/RGVAC and the rest of the newsgroups actively discouraged any type of "business" from advertising. I support Joe's current policy regarding commerce on the vector list. Steve Ozdemir sozdemir ps - Perhaps a new "Vector FS" list could be made instead of adding FS to the existing vector list. I, for one, won't subscribe to any new FS list, but others may be willing to slog through the noise to find the occasional "rare item at a reasonable price". Also, I'm curious if a new FS list would flourish...supposedly RGVAM was suppose to serve this need? -----Original Message----- From: FBowen ] Sent: Thursday, December 02, 1999 10:54 AM To: vectorlist Subject: RE: Selling Items on VL I'm not trying to keep this thread going (REALLY!) but it will come up again (and again and again and again). Why? Because the FS criteria is SUBJECTIVE! I too hardly ever read RGVAC anymore (except for the Clay & Mark Spaeth threads. They are really funny) because one must do a lot of work to find the useful information. But I would also like the possibility to share and get good deals on ANYTHING that could conceivably be related to vector videogames (parts, equipment, service, records, posters, etc). A lot of times I don't know that these things exist, so how can I look for them? I propose we take the previous idea of only allowing them on one day a month and add the requirement that the subject start with one string: "COMMERCE:" This would apply for anything to be sold, bought, traded, beaten up, blended, given away, transmogrified, etc. This would resolve the issue with the subjective criteria and different people's interpretations. Then people could set up filters on the string and/or delete all messages from the specified day if they choose. HOWEVER, I would prefer to keep the list in it's current state than see it turn into another RGVAC, if those are the only two choices. jwelser on 12/01/99 08:41:13 PM Please respond to vectorlist Sent by: owner-vectorlist To: vectorlist cc: Subject: RE: Selling Items on VL On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, first anme last name wrote: > I understand the consensus that this list could go haywire if FS posts are > allowed, but I for one kind of miss them. Can't we have some sort of > compromise on this issue? Like maybe 1 day a month when we can list items > for sale? Otherwise, they just all go to eBay and minimise one of the > benefits of being on this list. Comments? > I think Clay's intentions were good, but I think that his post was still not appropriate for the list......but not by much. The problem is, and has always been, that there is no real "quantitative" way to define what is and what isn't appropriate for the list. Let's leave it at this: If you are thinking of advertising something on this list, and there is any doubt in your mind as to whether or not it is appropriate, DON'T post it, because it's probably not appropriate. From matt Thu Dec 2 10:33:28 1999 Received: from admin.veriosc.com (admin.veriosc.com [192.215.246.2]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id KAA08123 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 10:33:23 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (matt@localhost) by admin.veriosc.com (/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA04089 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 08:34:41 -0800 (PST) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.veriosc.com: matt owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 08:34:41 -0800 (PST) From: Matt Rossiter - Verio Southern California X-Sender: matt@admin To: vectorlist Subject: RE: Selling Items on VL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN I agree with this. - and I don't think we need to change anything, things are going pretty much fine. Seeing information about CPO and multi-game production runs and discounts is absolutely fine by me because I feel the purpose of this list is to keep these games preserved. .... Seriously - the major problem is, and always has been the initial finger-pointing from people that aren't the moderators. That's how these threads get started. I think that there should definitely be rule against *this* in particular. If there is a problem that needs to be addressed, I'd recommend privately sending an email to Joe and leave it at that. Bringing stuff to the open *ALWAYS* causes problems. Now back to vector discussions...... Matt _____________________________________________________________________ On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, Ozdemir, Steven S, GOVMK wrote: > G'day folks, > > Adding commerce related topics to any discussion starts the group down a > slippery slope. I remember a time (almost a decade ago) when RGV/RGVA/RGVAC > and the rest of the newsgroups actively discouraged any type of "business" > from advertising. > > I support Joe's current policy regarding commerce on the vector list. > > Steve Ozdemir > sozdemir > > ps - Perhaps a new "Vector FS" list could be made instead of adding FS to > the existing vector list. I, for one, won't subscribe to any new FS list, > but others may be willing to slog through the noise to find the occasional > "rare item at a reasonable price". > > Also, I'm curious if a new FS list would flourish...supposedly RGVAM was > suppose to serve this need? > > -----Original Message----- > From: FBowen ] > Sent: Thursday, December 02, 1999 10:54 AM > To: vectorlist > Subject: RE: Selling Items on VL > > > > I'm not trying to keep this thread going (REALLY!) but it will come up > again (and again and again and again). Why? Because the FS criteria is > SUBJECTIVE! > > I too hardly ever read RGVAC anymore (except for the Clay & Mark Spaeth > threads. They are really funny) because one must do a lot of work to find > the useful information. But I would also like the possibility to share and > get good deals on ANYTHING that could conceivably be related to vector > videogames (parts, equipment, service, records, posters, etc). A lot of > times I don't know that these things exist, so how can I look for them? > > I propose we take the previous idea of only allowing them on one day a > month and add the requirement that the subject start with one string: > "COMMERCE:" This would apply for anything to be sold, bought, traded, > beaten up, blended, given away, transmogrified, etc. This would resolve > the issue with the subjective criteria and different people's > interpretations. Then people could set up filters on the string and/or > delete all messages from the specified day if they choose. > > HOWEVER, I would prefer to keep the list in it's current state than see it > turn into another RGVAC, if those are the only two choices. > > > > > > > jwelser on 12/01/99 08:41:13 PM > > Please respond to vectorlist > > Sent by: owner-vectorlist > > > To: vectorlist > cc: > > Subject: RE: Selling Items on VL > > > On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, first anme last name wrote: > > > I understand the consensus that this list could go haywire if FS posts > are > > allowed, but I for one kind of miss them. Can't we have some sort of > > compromise on this issue? Like maybe 1 day a month when we can list items > > for sale? Otherwise, they just all go to eBay and minimise one of the > > benefits of being on this list. Comments? > > > > I think Clay's intentions were good, but I think that his > post was still not appropriate for the list......but not by much. The > problem is, and has always been, that there is no real "quantitative" > way to define what is and what isn't appropriate for the list. Let's > leave it at this: If you are thinking of advertising something on this > list, and there is any doubt in your mind as to whether or not it is > appropriate, DON'T post it, because it's probably not appropriate. > > From jwelser Thu Dec 2 10:37:46 1999 Received: from piglet.cc.utexas.edu (jwelser@piglet.cc.utexas.edu [128.83.42.61]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id KAA08980 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 10:37:45 -0600 (CST) From: jwelser Received: from localhost (jwelser@localhost) by piglet.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1/piglet.mc-1.10) with ESMTP id KAA05629 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 10:37:40 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 10:37:39 -0600 (CST) X-Sender: jwelser@piglet.cc.utexas.edu To: vectorlist Subject: RE: Selling Items on VL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, Ozdemir, Steven S, GOVMK wrote: > ps - Perhaps a new "Vector FS" list could be made instead of adding FS to > the existing vector list. I, for one, won't subscribe to any new FS list, > but others may be willing to slog through the noise to find the occasional > "rare item at a reasonable price". I was actually thinking of doing exactly that. Initially, I would subscribe everybody who is subscribed to the vectorlist, and people who want to could unsubscribe at their leisure. In that case, the vectorlist policy would be changed to a more objective, "No For Sale/WTB. Period." Opinions? Joe From FBowen Thu Dec 2 10:46:50 1999 Received: from balrelay.balt.checkfree.com ([207.196.74.140]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id KAA10304 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 10:46:49 -0600 (CST) From: FBowen Subject: RE: Selling Items on VL To: vectorlist Cc: Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 11:45:30 -0500 Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on BALRELAY/MD/CheckFree(Release 5.0.1|July 16, 1999) at 12/02/99 11:49:21 AM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN Two thumbs up! jwelser on 12/02/99 11:37:39 AM Please respond to vectorlist Sent by: owner-vectorlist To: vectorlist cc: Subject: RE: Selling Items on VL On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, Ozdemir, Steven S, GOVMK wrote: > ps - Perhaps a new "Vector FS" list could be made instead of adding FS to > the existing vector list. I, for one, won't subscribe to any new FS list, > but others may be willing to slog through the noise to find the occasional > "rare item at a reasonable price". I was actually thinking of doing exactly that. Initially, I would subscribe everybody who is subscribed to the vectorlist, and people who want to could unsubscribe at their leisure. In that case, the vectorlist policy would be changed to a more objective, "No For Sale/WTB. Period." Opinions? Joe From tomm Thu Dec 2 11:07:52 1999 Received: from wodc7mr4.ffx.ops.us.uu.net (paleoalterdial.UU.NET [192.48.96.22]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id LAA13924 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 11:07:51 -0600 (CST) Received: from mgcap.com by wodc7mr4.ffx.ops.us.uu.net with ESMTP (peer crosschecked as: [208.248.241.145]) id QQhrwm02170 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 17:05:51 GMT Message-ID: <3846A770.EC2EB694 > Date: Thu, 02 Dec 1999 11:08:00 -0600 From: tom mcclintock Organization: MG Capital X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vectorlist Subject: Re: Selling Items on VL References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN delightful idea. jwelser wrote: > > On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, Ozdemir, Steven S, GOVMK wrote: > > > ps - Perhaps a new "Vector FS" list could be made instead of adding FS to > > the existing vector list. I, for one, won't subscribe to any new FS list, > > but others may be willing to slog through the noise to find the occasional > > "rare item at a reasonable price". > > I was actually thinking of doing exactly that. Initially, I would > subscribe everybody who is subscribed to the vectorlist, and people who > want to could unsubscribe at their leisure. > > In that case, the vectorlist policy would be changed to a more > objective, "No For Sale/WTB. Period." > > Opinions? > > Joe From cbright Thu Dec 2 11:28:26 1999 Received: from router.dmz.intouchsurvey.com (gate.intouchsurvey.com [206.191.25.226]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id LAA16569 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 11:28:23 -0600 (CST) Received: (from mail@localhost) by router.dmz.intouchsurvey.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) id RAA18743 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 17:28:08 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: router.dmz.intouchsurvey.com: mail set sender to using -f Received: from unknown(172.16.0.24) by router.dmz.intouchsurvey.com via smap (V2.0) id xma018738; Thu, 2 Dec 99 17:27:56 GMT From: "Chris Bright" To: Subject: RE: Selling Items on VL Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 12:26:06 -0500 Message-ID: <004901bf3cea$51d635b0$180010ac > MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 In-Reply-To: <3846A770.EC2EB694 > X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3612.1700 Importance: Normal Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN Hi all, Yes set it up, but could you make it a "Journal" type mailing list. ie. all message for one day are saved up and sent out as one message at some time (say 12 noon) I don't want 10 (or so) messages a day about things forsale, but I'd LOVE one to quickly go through. Later, Chris Bright From jess Thu Dec 2 11:43:30 1999 Received: from roper.uwyo.edu (pmdf@roper.uwyo.edu [129.72.10.8]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id LAA18676 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 11:43:29 -0600 (CST) Received: from asuwlink.uwyo.edu (asuwlink.uwyo.edu [129.72.10.2]) by ROPER.UWYO.EDU (PMDF V5.2-32 #33749) with ESMTP id <0FM400816JU0VQ@ROPER.UWYO.EDU> for vectorlist ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 10:42:01 -0700 (MST) Received: from magenta.com (ras8747.uwyo.edu [129.72.87.47]) by asuwlink.uwyo.edu (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA02940 for ; Thu, 02 Dec 1999 10:41:59 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 02 Dec 1999 10:43:08 -0700 From: Jess Askey Subject: Re: Selling Items on VL To: vectorlist Message-id: <3846AFAC.BD6489E1 > MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win98; I) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en References: <004901bf3cea$51d635b0$180010ac > Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN I like the journal idea as well. :-) jess Chris Bright wrote: > > Hi all, > > Yes set it up, but could you make it a "Journal" type mailing list. > > ie. all message for one day are saved up and sent out as one message at some > time (say 12 noon) > > I don't want 10 (or so) messages a day about things forsale, but I'd LOVE > one to quickly go through. > > Later, > Chris Bright From ClayC Thu Dec 2 11:45:40 1999 Received: from suprahwy.supra.com (suprahwy.supra.com [205.229.114.11]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id LAA18889 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 11:45:39 -0600 (CST) Received: (from smap@localhost) by suprahwy.supra.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA04247 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 09:45:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from supra.com(dogbert.supra.com 10.11.0.21) by suprahwy.supra.com via smap (V2.0) from ; id xma004243; Thu, 2 Dec 99 09:45:32 -0800 Received: from vanmail3.van.diamondmm.com by dogbert.supra.com id aa18839; 2 Dec 99 9:45 PST Received: by vanmail3.van.diamondmm.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 09:45:30 -0800 Message-ID: From: Clay Cowgill To: "'vectorlist '" Subject: RE: Selling Items on VL Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 09:45:29 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN Hey Roy, I'll take a Gravitar CPO. ;-) -Clay From ClayC Thu Dec 2 11:50:46 1999 Received: from suprahwy.supra.com (suprahwy.supra.com [205.229.114.11]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id LAA19644 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 11:50:44 -0600 (CST) Received: (from smap@localhost) by suprahwy.supra.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA04299 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 09:50:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from supra.com(dogbert.supra.com 10.11.0.21) by suprahwy.supra.com via smap (V2.0) from ; id xma004296; Thu, 2 Dec 99 09:50:34 -0800 Received: from vanmail3.van.diamondmm.com by dogbert.supra.com id aa18897; 2 Dec 99 9:50 PST Received: by vanmail3.van.diamondmm.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 09:50:32 -0800 Message-ID: From: Clay Cowgill To: "'vectorlist '" Subject: RE: Selling Items on VL Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 09:50:32 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN Up to this point I've been using my own judgement on what I think is applicable to post here. We see discussion about desoldering equipment, EPROM programmers, eBay practices, Newton's Method, raster image compression and a bunch of "other" topics. Sure, you can connect a thin line from any of these to vector games ("I'm writing a vector game, I'm fixing a vector game, I'm buying a vector game, I'm storing compressed docs of a vector game") but you can do that with anything. ("I have an antique pie rack that makes a great holder for vector game boards for sale..."). I offered up the desoldering stations here because they were discussed recently and I was willing to sell them cheap to the vectorlist people who would probably like to have them. (Seeing as how they all sold in less time that it took me to eat lunch I'd guess that at least some people thought it was worthwhile.) Is selling a Catbox here OK? (It works for non-vector games.) Is offering a 68000 ICE for a good price OK? (It works for non-vector games too.) The signal to noise ratio seems like a weak excuse to me. Monty-Pythonizing posts isn't noise? Gregg's trade offer for a B&K CRT rejuv was OK? John offering up relatively rare DAC-80's for-sale must be noise too. I not going to risk offering the "wrong" thing to the group anymore. Maybe we should just take the list to full moderation to make sure no noise gets in instead of some noise being OK and others not... jmp rant_off -Clay From shag Thu Dec 2 11:55:01 1999 Received: from smtprtp1.ntcom.nortel.net (smtprtp1.ntcom.nortel.net [137.118.22.14]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id LAA20376 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 11:54:55 -0600 (CST) Received: from zrchb213.us.nortel.com (actually zrchb213) by smtprtp1.ntcom.nortel.net; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 12:54:12 -0500 Received: by zrchb213.us.nortel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 11:54:10 -0600 Message-ID: <402CC1A33A3FD311A5A00000F8082A5F14E7FE > From: "Simon Whittam" To: "'vectorlist '" Subject: RE: Selling Items on VL Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 11:54:04 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01BF3CEE.3C697350" Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01BF3CEE.3C697350 Content-Type: text/plain Maybe you should trade a soldering station for a CPO? :-) SPW (ok, enough, I know) > -----Original Message----- > From: Clay Cowgill [SMTP:ClayC ] > Sent: Thursday, December 02, 1999 12:45 PM > To: 'vectorlist ' > Subject: RE: Selling Items on VL > > Hey Roy, > > I'll take a Gravitar CPO. ;-) > > -Clay > ------_=_NextPart_001_01BF3CEE.3C697350 Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable RE: Selling Items on VL

Maybe you should = trade a soldering station for a CPO?  :-)

  SPW (ok, = enough, I know)

    -----Original Message-----
    Clay Cowgill [SMTP:ClayC ]
    Sent:   Thursday, December 02, 1999 12:45 PM
    To:     'vectorlist '
    Subject:       = RE: Selling Items on VL

    Hey Roy,

    I'll take a Gravitar CPO. ;-)

    -Clay

------_=_NextPart_001_01BF3CEE.3C697350-- From awilson Thu Dec 2 12:15:33 1999 Received: from mx.seanet.com (dns2.seanet.com [199.181.164.2]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id MAA23647 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 12:15:21 -0600 (CST) Received: from KIMAGURE (host-29-215.dsl-sea.seanet.com [208.12.29.215]) by mx.seanet.com (8.9.3/Seanet-8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA27576 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 10:15:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 10:15:12 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199912021815.KAA27576 > From: Andrew Wilson To: vectorlist In-reply-to: (message from Clay Cowgill on Thu, 2 Dec 1999 09:50:32 -0800) Subject: Re: Selling Items on VL References: Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN I understand Clay's point. There was no reason to rag him out in public about his FS post (actually, the whole thing came off as incredibly petty), and his FS post is no more off-topic than most of the other posts we see around here (as Clay pointed out). The list is currently working quite well, and has worked well for the year or so that I've been on it. I might respectfully suggest that unless the FS posts start getting out of hand, we cut people some slack. Leave it to Joe to enforce the list rules, and if you don't like a post, send some private email about it to Joe and let him deal with it. Drew From jbovee@voyager.net Thu Dec 2 12:21:23 1999 Received: from mail1.voyager.net (mail1.voyager.net [209.153.128.76]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id MAA24680 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 12:21:22 -0600 (CST) Received: from super-portable (as2-dial14.hsng.mi.voyager.net [209.153.186.71]) by mail1.voyager.net (8.9.1/Voyager-MailX) with SMTP id NAA21246 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 13:22:51 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <002301bf3cf1$f890fe60$47ba99d1@super-portable> From: "Jeff Bovee" To: Subject: Re: Selling Items on VL Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 13:20:50 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN Could that robo idea be used with this so that for sale posts to the list automatically get screened from people who don't want them? Maybe just by having the words "for sale" or FS in the header they could then be filtered and distributed only to people on the list that haven't asked to be filtered. That way when someone wants to join or un-join the vectorlist it would still only be one list. Just my quarters worth, and to keep this on topic, I just got my first Tempest, and someone ripped the HV out of it, and other stuff as well so I will be peppering the list with many inane questions about fixing it ;-) Jeff From chris.loggans Thu Dec 2 12:28:08 1999 Received: from delta1.DST-DOMAIN ([216.181.19.201]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id MAA25808 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 12:28:04 -0600 (CST) Received: by DELTA1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9) id ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 13:27:54 -0500 Message-ID: From: Chris Loggans To: "'vectorlist '" Subject: Asteroids Question Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 13:27:50 -0500 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9) Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN To start a non-policy related thread... I've noticed a strange thing happening on a number of Asteroids PCB's that I have and I thought someone here could shed some light on it. I have about 10 working Asteroids PCB's and I've noticed this occur probably 6-7 of them. Every once and a while, probably once or twice a round, when you shoot an asteroid, it doesn't explode but collapses into a faint, but noticeable solid line. It is usually a vertical line about 2-3" long. While this is occurring, everything else on the screen is perfectly fine? I have tried this on two different machines/monitors and get the same results so it does appear to be PCB related. Has anyone else ever seen this or know why it is occurring? Thanks, -Chris From jess Thu Dec 2 12:43:42 1999 Received: from roper.uwyo.edu (pmdf@roper.uwyo.edu [129.72.10.8]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id MAA01550 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 12:43:39 -0600 (CST) Received: from asuwlink.uwyo.edu (asuwlink.uwyo.edu [129.72.60.2]) by ROPER.UWYO.EDU (PMDF V5.2-32 #33749) with ESMTP id <0FM400D4GMOA8H@ROPER.UWYO.EDU> for vectorlist ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 11:43:23 -0700 (MST) Received: from magenta.com (ras8747.uwyo.edu [129.72.87.47]) by asuwlink.uwyo.edu (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA24194 for ; Thu, 02 Dec 1999 11:43:21 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 02 Dec 1999 11:44:25 -0700 From: Jess Askey Subject: Re: Asteroids Question To: vectorlist Message-id: <3846BE09.931DD20D > MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win98; I) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en References: Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN Chris Loggans wrote: > > To start a non-policy related thread... I've noticed a strange thing > happening on a number of Asteroids PCB's that I have and I thought someone > here could shed some light on it. I have about 10 working Asteroids PCB's > and I've noticed this occur probably 6-7 of them. Every once and a while, > probably once or twice a round, when you shoot an asteroid, it doesn't > explode but collapses into a faint, but noticeable solid line. It is > usually a vertical line about 2-3" long. While this is occurring, > everything else on the screen is perfectly fine? I have tried this on two > different machines/monitors and get the same results so it does appear to be > PCB related. Has anyone else ever seen this or know why it is occurring? Weird one. Since it collapses into a vertical line, it is obviously a problem in the X axis circuitry. But.. the strange thing is that it doesn't effect the whole screen, only single objects. Since the DAC and everything past it (hereafter refered to as DAC+) basically just follows the vector counters, the Im guessing that the DAC+ is all okay. Esspecially since the 'invisible' position vectors arene't collapsing as well (which would make the whole screen go into vertical line mode). So when it draws an Asteroid, the beam (turned off at this point), Moves to the center of the asteroids position. All is okay here. Now the asteroid itself starts to get drawn using the 'draw' instructions in the state machine which starts the vector position counters going and the vector moving to draw a line of the correct slope and length. If the X counter is not incrementing or decrementing, this exact problem would happen. Now Im not too familiar with the Asteroids vector gen, I know things are done differently with the counters on it as compared to games after Tempest? But Im not sure how exactly. Anyone know more? From twisnion Thu Dec 2 12:46:14 1999 Received: from mail.enteract.com (mail.enteract.com [207.229.143.33]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id MAA01919 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 12:46:10 -0600 (CST) Received: from tomwiz (207-229-149-152.d.enteract.com [207.229.149.152]) by mail.enteract.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA57601 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 12:46:07 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from twisnion ) Message-ID: <001801bf3cf5$a421dd00$ed28a8c0@tomwiz> From: "TomW" To: Subject: Ok, Different Topic... Fluke 9010 Test Program for Asteroids... Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 12:46:33 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0013_01BF3CC3.433B1CE0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0013_01BF3CC3.433B1CE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Gang, To bring the list back on a 'fun' topic... I've been working on a series of menu based test programs for the fluke = 9010. I have taken the tests out of the atari cat box manual and brought over what I could = for the asteroids board. Heres what I have done so far: The code is posed at www.enteract.com/~twisnion/asteroids1.txt 1. Ram test, the Fluke test is much better that the game test, I've = broken the flukes test down to two rams at a time to at least get the = 'person testing' beyond the Bit 7 @ 3E21 bad, so you get a Bad Ram R3 M3 = message instead. 2. Rom Test. I have taked the sig's from the rev 2 sw and broken the rom = test up to test each chip seporatly, giving Rom XX bad. Need to add rev = 1 here and alternate rom positions next. 3. Sound test, cycles each sound with a cascading menu until CONT is = pressed for the next sound, great for debugging a missing sound. 4. I/O test for inputs, will show dips and buttons pressed, NOT YET = DONE.. 5. Vector generator, I took the atari '+' display and put it in the test = procedure and looped it until cont is pressed, great help for the VG = section !!=20 6. Address Decode, was in the cat box test procedure, ok for debugging. = Has you probe a specific chip for pulse count to verify its swinging = ok.. I need to make a clean up pass on the code, so go easy on me, I know one = of the displays is showing the wrong #.. Now, I'm working on Sig analysis for the VG section, since I really = would NOT like to cut traces or clip on dip clips specific to a chip to = inject the stimulas sig so I'm looking for ideas on how to create that = part of the test program. I have experimented using the atari + display = code and I can generate a stable sig on the vg program stack area and = again on the XY area, but you cannot get a sig from the vector timer or = program counter area without additional stimulas that I have been able = to figure out.. So, where I'm heading is to just load the program stack = with cmds that would cause certian things to happen on a go cmd, TimerX, = Halt,Stop,Go etc... and use the probe to pulse count again or just run = the + display test and count pulses against that... Anyone got a VG = command list and what they do ?? I hope I made a little sense, any opinions ??? Oh, and I've got an extra 9010 with a Z80 pod for sale. TomW ------=_NextPart_000_0013_01BF3CC3.433B1CE0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Gang,
 
To bring the list back on a 'fun'=20 topic...
 
I've been working on a series of = menu based test=20 programs for the fluke 9010. I have taken
the tests out of the atari cat box = manual and=20 brought over what I could for the asteroids board. Heres what I have = done so=20 far:
 
The code is posed at www.enteract.co= m/~twisnion/asteroids1.txt
 
1. Ram test, the Fluke test is much = better that=20 the game test, I've broken the flukes test down to two rams at a time to = at=20 least get the 'person testing' beyond the Bit 7 @ 3E21 bad, so you get a = Bad Ram=20 R3 M3 message instead.
 
2. Rom Test. I have taked the sig's = from the rev=20 2 sw and broken the rom test up to test each chip seporatly, giving Rom = XX bad.=20 Need to add rev 1 here and alternate rom positions next.
 
3. Sound test, cycles each sound = with a=20 cascading menu until CONT is pressed for the next sound, great for = debugging a=20 missing sound.
 
4. I/O test for inputs, will show = dips and=20 buttons pressed, NOT YET DONE..
 
5. Vector generator, I took the = atari '+'=20 display and put it in the test procedure and looped it until cont is = pressed,=20 great help for the VG section !!
 
6. Address Decode, was in the cat = box test=20 procedure, ok for debugging. Has you probe a specific chip for pulse = count to=20 verify its swinging ok..
 
I need to make a clean up pass on = the code, so=20 go easy on me, I know one of the displays  is showing the wrong=20 #..
 
 
Now, I'm working on Sig analysis for = the VG=20 section, since I really would NOT like to cut traces or clip on dip = clips=20 specific to a chip to inject the stimulas sig so I'm looking for ideas = on how to=20 create that part of the test program. I have experimented using the = atari +=20 display code and I can generate a stable sig on the vg program stack = area and=20 again on the XY area, but you cannot get a sig from the vector timer or = program=20 counter area without additional stimulas that I have been able to figure = out..=20 So, where I'm heading is to just load the program stack with cmds that = would=20 cause certian things to happen on a go cmd, TimerX, Halt,Stop,Go etc... = and use=20 the probe to pulse count again or just run the + display test and count = pulses=20 against that... Anyone got a VG command list and what they do = ??
 
I hope I made a little sense, any opinions = ???
 
Oh, and I've got an extra 9010 with a Z80 pod for=20 sale.
 
 
TomW
------=_NextPart_000_0013_01BF3CC3.433B1CE0-- From jenison Thu Dec 2 12:49:39 1999 Received: from ftpbox.mot.com (ftpbox.mot.com [129.188.136.101]) by mcfeeley.cc.utexas.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/mcfeeley.mc-1.26) with ESMTP id MAA02463 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 12:49:38 -0600 (CST) Received: [from pobox.mot.com (pobox.mot.com [129.188.137.100]) by ftpbox.mot.com (MOT-ftpbox 1.0) with ESMTP id LAA28629 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 11:49:37 -0700 (MST)] Received: [from relay1.cig.mot.com (relay1.cig.mot.com [136.182.15.23]) by pobox.mot.com (MOT-pobox 2.0) with ESMTP id LAA06599 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 11:49:36 -0700 (MST)] Received: from crecendo.cig.mot.com (crecendo [160.15.1.35]) by relay1.cig.mot.com (8.8.8+Sun/SCERG-RELAY-1.11b) with ESMTP id MAA25702 for ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 12:49:34 -0600 (CST) Received: (jenison (8.7.5 Motorola CIG/ITS v1.1 (Solaris 2.5)) id MAA20931 for vectorlist ; Thu, 2 Dec 1999 12:49:18 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 12:49:18 -0600 (CST) From: Mark Jenison Message-Id: <199912021849.MAA20931 > In-Reply-To: Jess Askey "Re: Asteroids Question" (Dec 2, 11:44am) References: <199912021845.MAA20619 > X-face: oR?Ne3)HMw-8KhQ[.WK_f(>#V%Uoh6<uZW2%T[G$FZ[$](cd:7rBD)F36`*Ea#ym.|Kw5k;\Zx*CkhL=Tg^mSN:b_D!UEf7C"&f\x7Xxt!#UmwVu|hX6brc8QWO;6+pNL X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.1 10oct95) To: vectorlist Subject: Re: Asteroids Question Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Reply-To: vectorlist Sender: owner-vectorlist X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.07 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN On Dec 2, 11:44am, Jess Askey wrote: > Subject: Re: Asteroids Question > Chris Loggans wrote: > > > > To start a non-policy related thread... I've noticed a strange thing > > happening on a number of Asteroids PCB's that I have and I thought someone > > here could shed some light on it. I have about 10 working Asteroids PCB's > > and I've noticed this occur probably 6-7 of them. Every once and a while, > > probably once or twice a round, when you shoot an asteroid, it doesn't > > explode but collapses into a faint, but noticeable solid line. It is > > usually a vertical line about 2-3" long. While this is occurring, > > everything else on the screen is perfectly fine? I have tried this on two > > different machines/monitors and get the same results so it does appear to be > > PCB related. Has anyone e